Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF SACROCOCCYGEAL CHORDOMA



Abstract

Introduction and Aims: Sacrococcygeal chordoma presents a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem with a high incidence of local recurrence. The report aims to define the importance of adequate surgical treatment on outcome and survival.

Method: Fifty-eight patients underwent surgical treatment for sacrococcygeal chordoma between 1979 and 2001. The series included 19 women and 39 men with an average age of 56.2 (range 13–76) years at diagnosis. Depending on the level and extent of the lesion, a posterior approach was performed in 25 patients, and a combined antero-posterior approach in 33 patients. A wide surgical margin was achieved in 22 patients, 14 marginal and 22 intralesional.

Results: At average follow-up of 92.2 (range 18–276) months. Thirty-three patients were alive with no evidence of disease. Twenty-one patients had local recurrence. Recurrence-free survival at five years was 67% and at 10 years 57%. The overall survival was 74%, 51%, 42% at five years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively. All patients with wide margins survived (100%), which was significantly different from patients who had either marginal or intralesional excision (p=0.0001). The type of surgical approach (p=0.138) does not influence the likelihood to obtain a good margin, although patients with wide margins were also more likely to have small tumors. A wide margin was achieved in 48% using a combined antero-posterior approach, whereas this was the case only in 29% using a posterior approach. Tumor volume univariately assessed, however, does not seem to compromise the possibility of obtaining a wide margin (p=0.21). Multivariate analysis identified – in contrast to tumor volume (p=0.13) – margin (p=0.0001) and age (p=0.04) as predictors of survival. Whereas survival is independent of age in the case with wide margins, patients with marginal or intralesional margins and an age above 60 years have a better survival (43% at 10 years) than patients younger than 60 years with those parameters (20% at 10 years; p=0.0776).

Conclusion: A wide margin is the most important predictor of survival in patients with sacrococcygeal chordoma. Tumor volume per se has no negative impact on survival as long as a wide margin is obtained. Therefore, for large tumors and tumors above S3 we prefer combined antero-posterior approach. If a wide margin cannot be obtained, then young patients have a worse prognosis than older patients.

These abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, George Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, The William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.

One or more of the authors are receiving or have received material benefits or support from a commercial source.