Abstract
Background: In recent years there has been an increase in the insertion of prosthetic devices in orthopaedics. In spite of improvements in surgical techniques and antibiotic prophylaxis, the absolute number of infectious complications is high. Infections have a negative impact in patient’s quality of life and have high costs of management.
Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of diagnosis, aetiology, and therapy of prosthetic devices infections observed from 1985 to 1999 in the operative unit for diagnosis and treatment of Infections in orthopaedics of Ospedale S. Corona- Pietra Ligure (SV).
Results: During the study period, 251 patients with infected hip prosthesis and 133 with infected knee prosthesis had been treated. Diagnosis of infection was made by means of clinical features supported by x-ray, MRI, CT scan, ultrasonography and radio-nuclide scan. Aetiology was established by microbiological culture and histology. The majority of cases were single agent infections due to Gram-positives, especially S. aureus and S epidermidis, isolated in 41% of hip and 53% of knee prosthesis infection, while P. aeruginosa represented the most frequently isolated Gram-negative (3% in hip prosthesis and 10.6 % in kne prosthesis).
Polymicrobial infections (with constant presence of S. aureus and/or S. epidermidis) accounted for 8% of hip and 7% of knee prosthesis infections. Treatment was represented by prolonged antibiotic administration (at least 8 weeks) associated with surgical debridment inacute infections, and two-stage exchange in chronic infections. In 23 hip infections in patients in poor clinical conditions or in suspected persistence of latent infection a new prosthesis was not replaced and Girdlestone’s hip arthroplasty was performed.
Conclusions: Gram-positives are the main cause of orthopaedic infections but Gram-negatives, especially P aeruginosa, are often isolated. The treatment must necessarily be combined: antibiotic therapy and surgical treatment. Only in presence of optimal conditions a new prosthesis can be replaced.
The abstracts were prepared by editorial secretary, Mrs K. Papastefanou. Correspondence should be addressed to Professor K.N. Malizos, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessalia, Larissa, 41222 GREECE
