Abstract
Introduction: One of the primary complications in total hip and knee arthroplasty is infection. One of the major risk factors for deep periprosthetic infection is wound infection. This alone is associated with a substantial morbidity-increase which, in turn, increases hospital admittance time and therefore adds significant costs to the healthcare system. The aim of this study is to determine whether contamination of instruments used during primary insertion of a prosthesis, can be considered an early indicator for the occurrence of prolonged wound discharge. Early antibiotic treatment could then prevent this and decrease hospital admittance time and costs to the health care system.
Material and Methods: During 121 procedures, swabs were taken from the first unused broach at the beginning and at the end of the procedure. Removed material from the bone (acetabulum and femur in the hip joint; femur and tibia in case of the knee joint) was tested for contamination as well. During 50 procedures a control swab was taken. The patients on the ward were also monitored to find out whether prolonged wound discharge occurred and to see after how many days the patients were discharged.
Results: In 46 cases (38%) at least one culture showed microbial growth. In the other 75, there was no growth at all. If one of the cultures is positive, there is a 52% risk of prolonged wound discharge. Ifall cultures are negative, this risk is reduced to 13% (Chi-square: PO.001). Patients with a positive peroperative culture have to remain in the hospital for an additional 2.4 days (T-test: P-0.001).
Conclusion: Peroperative culturing during primary insertion of a knee or hip prosthesis, provides a reliable tool to predict postoperative duration of wound discharge and hospital-admittance time.
The abstracts were prepared by editorial secretary, Mrs K. Papastefanou. Correspondence should be addressed to Professor K.N. Malizos, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Thessalia, Larissa, 41222 GREECE
