Abstract
Study Design: Cadaveric study on the effects of Dynesys.
Summary of Background Data: Dynesys is a novel form of soft stabilization that utilises pedicle screws and modular spacers mounted on a stabilising cord to control movement of the instrumented segment in all planes. In this way it provides a biomechanical alternative with greater physiological function than spinal fusion and may prevent the penalties of “overworking” adjacent levels.
Objective: The biomechanical response of both the instrumented and adjacent intervertebral discs (IVD) is investigated under compressive loading in flexion and extension. The effects of varying spacer heights on intradiscal pressure distribution are also reported.
Methods: Twelve L3-5 cadaveric lumbar segments were compressed to 1 kN in 6° flexion, neutral and 4° extension. The stress distribution in the mid-sagittal and posterolateral diameters of both the bridged and adjacent discs was measured by withdrawing a miniature pressure transducer across the IVD. Dynesys was applied across a single level and +2mm, neutral and −2mm spacer configurations tested in each position of loading. Over 2500 stress profiles were collected and the data obtained from measurements with and without application of Dynesys was analysed.
Results: In the absence of instrumentation stress peaks in the anterior annulus increased with a greater degree of specimen flexion. In 0° to 6° flexion, Dynesys eliminated the anterior stress peaks observed in the instrumented disc in 80% of specimens tested. In the +2mm to −2mm spacer range tested, posterior stress peaks were generally seen to increase with decreasing spacer height. Little effect is seen with the application of Dynesys to a non-degenerate disc. Preliminary analysis of the data suggests that stress distribution through the adjacent disc appears largely unchanged with instrumentation of the inferior segment.
Conclusions: Dynesys has the potential to relieve peak stresses in the anterior annulus seen particularly in positions of flexion. Spacer size influences the generation of peak stresses seen within the posterior annulus. Initial observations indicate that the IVD of the adjacent motion segment is not biomechanically prejudiced following the application of Dynesys.
These abstracts were prepared by Mr. Brian J C Freeman FRCS (Tr & Orth). Correspondence should be addressed to him at The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, University Hospital, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH.
