Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME: FACTORS AFFECTING THE OUTCOME OF 42 PATIENTS WITH A MEAN FOLLOW UP OF 5 YEARS



Abstract

Objective: To determine the factors which influence outcome after surgery for cauda equina syndrome. Particular attention has been given to sphincteric recovery.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study with prospective clinical follow up.

Subjects: 56 patients with evidence of a sphincteric disturbance who underwent urgent surgery between 1994 and 2002 were identified and invited for follow up.

Outcome Measures: History and examination, Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire, Visual Analogue Score, Low Back Outcome Score, Modified Somatic Perception Score, Modified Zung Depression Score, International Prostate Severity Score, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire and Sheffield Female Pelvic Floor Questionnaire.

Results: 42 patients attended with a mean follow up of 60 months (Range 25–114 months). Mean age at onset was 41 years (Range 24–67 years) with 23 males and 19 females. 25 patients had sudden onset of symptoms in less than 24 hours. 26 patients were operated on within 48 hours of onset. At presentation urinary retention was associated with acute onset of less than 24 hours (p< 0.01), leg weakness (p< 0.01), abnormal leg sensation (p< 0.05) and abnormal rectal tone (p< 0.05). Bilateral radiculopathy was associated with leg weakness (p< 0.005). All patients with abnormal rectal tone (21) had abnormal rectal sensation.

At follow up significantly more females had urinary incontinence (p< 0.001) and bowel disturbance (p< 0.05), higher VAS scores (p< 0.05) and lower SF36 Pain and Energy scores (p< 0.05) than males. Urinary disturbance at presentation did not affect the outcomes. Bowel disturbance at presentation was associated with sexual problems (< 0.005) and abnormal rectal tone (p< 0.05) at follow up. Objective reduced perianal sensation at onset persisted in a significant number at follow up (21/32 patients; p< 0.05) as did leg weakness (14/23; p< 0.005). There was a weak association between delay to operation and bowel disturbance (p< 0.05) at follow up. Eight patients had faecal soiling and faecal incontinence at follow up and this was associated with sudden onset of symptoms, initial abnormal rectal tone and time to operation (p< 0.05). The SF36 scores at follow up were reduced compared to age matched norms in the population. The mean ODI was 29, LBOS 42 and VAS 4.5.

Conclusions: In our series the duration of symptoms and speed of onset prior to surgery appears to influence bowel but not bladder outcome two years after surgery. Based on the SF36, LBOS and ODI scores, patients who have had CES do not return to a normal status. Patient counselling about this would therefore be appropriate.

Correspondence should be addressed to SBPR c/o Royal college of Surgeons, 35 - 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN