Abstract
Little is known about how arthroscopic knots behave in terms of reverse slippage and creep during the first few hours following a Bankart repair. We aimed to assess differences between knot types tied with a variety of suture materials when exposed to loading which might be expected during the first 12 hours following a repair.
This study uses an apparatus to model the tensioning of a slipknot, the closing of a Bankart lesion and any reverse slippage occurring on removal of the tensioning force. Eight examples each of the Duncan loop and SMC knots were tied by an experienced surgeon using 4 different suture materials (PDS, Ethibond, Panacryl, Fibrewire). An arthroscopic knotting technique was used utilising a knot pusher. Each knot was locked with 3 half-hitches alternating direction and post each time. Any reverse slippage occurring during the tying process was recorded. Each knot was then left in situ for 12 hours under loads equivalent to a repaired Bankart lesion and any subsequent reverse slippage was recorded at the end of this period.
After initial passing of the Duncan loop the sutures were ranked inversely to size of suture loop (resistance to slippage) in order Panacryl (5.08±0.15mm); Fibrewire (5.7±1.03mm); Ethibond (7.22±3.47mm) and PDS (8.2±5.16mm). After passing of locking hitches, they ranked Ethibond (5.13±0.24mm); PDS (5.15±0.09mm); Panacryl (5.17±0.13mm) and Fibrewire (5.66±0.5mm – significant p< 0.05). After 12 hrs, some evidence of reverse slippage was noted, Ethibond (5.23±0.27mm); PDS (5.27±0.13mm); Panacryl (5.3±0.16mm) and Fibrewire (5.66±0.5mm – significant p< 0.05). The SMC knot showed similar results.
If a slip-knot back slips it can be tightened with the first locking hitch. After this further hitches do not tighten the knot further. Some slippage was noted during the first 12 hrs. Using arthroscopic techniques, Fibrewire performs less well than other materials.
Correspondence should be addressed to BESS c/o BOA, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE
