Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR OSTEOARTHROSIS JUVENILIS: TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES AND SOLUTIONS



Abstract

Purpose: We expose technical problems encountered for prosthesis replacement in osteoarthrosis juvenilis (OJ). The characteristic feature of this disease is early joint destruction during growth.

Material and methods: Total knee arthoplasty (TKA) was performed in 17 severely disabled patients (31 knees): Steinbrocker stage II=30%, stage III=30%, stage IV=40%. Mean age at operation was twenty years (14–29). Technical difficulties were related to the following combinations: 1) multidirectional malformations, generally in valgus (mean 16°, range 5–30°) in 30% of the knees associated with external rotation (mean 20°, range 5–50) and sagittal deformation with permanent flexion (mean 31°, range 5–60°) with external or posterior tibia dislocation; 2) limited joint motion: 71° (0–115°); 3) extraarticular deformations with permanent flexion or vicious hip rotation, tibial or femoral callus; 4) major condyle dysplasia due to growth deficiency (3/31 or necrosis (3/31); 5) low patella (100%) and subluxation; 6) weak bone and fragile skin related to corticosteroid therapy; 7) persistent growth cartilage in four patients. We tried to implant the most adapted prosthesis in each individual situation, favouring the least constrained implant possible.

Results: We used fifteen mobile plateau prostheses including five pure gliding TKA and ten posterostabilised TKA with a mobile plateau and 16 hinge prostheses with two rotators. Thirty of the 31 TKA were custom-made.

Discussion: Our different approaches enabled us to propose the following: correction of extra-articular deformations by TKA, after tenotomy and traction, or after concomitant osteotomy; primary approach after checking the vasculonervous bundle (popliteal sciatic); sub-periosteal dissection preserving the lateral ligaments searching to achieve ligament balance when possible in order to implant the least constrained implant possible; non-cemented implants, especially for “soft” or “fatty” bone; no patellar resurfacing when there is a risk of an overly thick low and subluxed patella.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.