Abstract
Purpose: The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure is often performed for the treatment of posttraumatic degeneration of the distal radioulnar joint. Few studies have been devoted specifically to the proximal stump of the ulnar after this procedure. The aim of our study was to conduct a radioclinical evaluation of the dynamics of the proximal ulnar stump.
Material and methods: This retrospective analysis involved fourteen patients (four women and ten men), mean age 48 years who underwent the procedure between January 1991 and March 2002. All presented posttraumatic degradation of the distal radioulnar joint. The operation took place twelve months after trauma on average. Mean ulnar resection was 11 mm, performed as distally as possible. The pronator quadratus was not advanced into the false joint. Pronation-supination rehabilitation exercises were instituted shortly after surgery. A static and dynamic x-rays protocol was designed for analysis.
Results: Patients were reviewed at five years two months on average. There were two complications: fusion of the intentional ulnar pseudarthrosis and one pseudarthrosis of the distal radioulnar joint. Time to resumption of former activity was nine months on average. Two patients could not resume their former activity. Seven patients complained of mechanical pain at the ulnar resection. Three patients reported cracking sounds along the ulnar border of the wrist and two patients presented an objective snap during pronosupination. Clinically, the ulnar stump was unstable in the sagittal plan in all cases. Radiographs confirmed this instability. Clinically, there was also an instability in the frontal plane in three patients. The dynamic films did not confirm frontal instability.
Discussion: Although less so than after the Darrach procedure, the proximal ulnar stump is the principle complication of the Savué-Kapandji procedure. Preservation of the structures stabilising the distal ulnar stump is crucial: periosteum, interosseous membrane, ulnar extensor of the carpus, pronator quadratus. Our use of a shorter resection made as distally as possible was only able to avoid a certain degree of instability which was nevertheless well tolerated.
Conclusion: The Sauvé-Kapandji procedure provides very satisfactory results for pain and motion. All patients appeared to have some degree of distal ulnar stump instability which was as a rule well tolerated. Nevertheless, one patient required a revision for stabilisation. This instability remains an unsolved problem which apparently cannot be prevented even with a very rigorous technique.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.
