Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TREATMENT OF CALCIFYING ROTATOR CUFF TENDINOPATHY WITH SYSTEMATIC ACROMIOPLASTY



Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the respective roles of acromioplasty and curettage of calcifications in arthroscopic treatment of calcifying tendinopathy of the rotator cuff.

Material and methods: We reviewed 41 cases of calcifying tendinopathy at mean 42 months. We retained for analysis only true calcifications identified at least 12 months after arthroscopy. All patients underwent acromioplasty and 13 underwent calcification curettage. The physical examination searched for subacromial impingement and cuff tendon suffering. The weighted Constant score was determined to assess outcome as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Patient satisfaction was assessed using three subjective questions. We searched for persistent calcification on the AP and Lamy lateral x-rays and quantified acromial resection by measuring the height of the subacromial space, the acromial arrow, and the type of acromion (Bigliani). Ultrasonography was performed to search for cuff lesions. Cuffs were classed as normal, atrophic or torn.

Results: After statistical analysis, the mean Constant score was found to have increased from 55 points to 80 points, with 88% excellent and good results (weighted Constant score > 85%). There was no significant difference between patients with and without calcification curettage (p> 0.1). Patients who were mobilised rapidly had a better outcome (p< 0.005). Subjectively, 88% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied.These results were not correlated with duration of follow-up. The degree of preoperative calcification did not affect outcome, but persistent calcification (nine cases) had an unfavourable effect on outcome. Nevertheless, 80% of the calcifications without curettage did not resorb after acromioplasty. The type of acromion had an effect on outcome. Acromions which were not flat (type II or III) had an unfavourable influence. The degree of acromial correction had a significant effect on outcome, the Constant score increased proportionally with the height of the subacromial space and inversely with acromial arrow. Ultrasonography disclosed two cuff tears but in elderly subjects, probably due to degeneration.

Conclusion: Curettage of calcifications does not improve outcome of good quality acromioplasty. The stage of the calcification is not an indication for curettage. Furthermore, it appears that the impingement is partly the cause of persistent calcifications since 80% of them disappeared after acromioplasty alone.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.