Abstract
Purpose: We compared three fixation systems for proximal fractures of the humerus to elaborate a rigid extra-medullary implant: the basket plate. This novel implant allows fixation of the tubercles with a claw system associated or not with a central cephalic locking screw. The objectives of this study were: check the resistance of the prototype, evaluate the contributions of the claws, and the usefulness of locking.
Material and methods: This was a prototype experimental study comparing a commonly used implant (Maconor2 plate) with the new implant using two series of static mechanical tests (Instrum). The tests were performed on 20 DMO-frozen anatomic specimens using the four-fragment fracture model. An implant was assigned to five groups of randomly selected specimens. The first tests (three groups) were axial compression tests mimicking abduction in the plane of the scaphoid. We analysed the overall mechanical behaviour of the implant and evaluated the locking system. The second tests (two groups) were traction tests. We analysed the behaviour of the fixed tuberosities. The mechanical resistance of the assemblies was noted as the limit load on the force: deformation curve and as the rigidity of the slope.
Results: The first tests showed that the implant was improved by the locking system and had better overall mechanical characteristics than the compared implant, although the difference was not statistically significant. The better hold in the tubercles provided by the claws was expected after the first tests and confirmed by the second tests, but the difference was not significant.
Discussion: The prototype improved with the locking system presented mechanical resistance equivalent to the compared model. The usefulness of locking could not be demonstrated but was considered to improve tolerance to loading by better force distribution. The contribution of the claws was not demonstrated statistically although the results are in line with early hopes. The present findings and data in the literature on shoulder biomechanics suggest that the tests should be conducted on a larger number of specimens to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. The tested series was too small.
Conclusion: Comparison of mechanical resistance with theoretical data on forces applied to the proximal humerus show that the prototype is well adapted, allowing immediate postoperative motion. A prospective study is currently being conducted in our unit.
Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.
