PROGNOSIS OF SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA AS A FUNCTION OF INITIAL MANAGEMENT: EXPERIENCE AT THE BIRMINGHAM REFERRAL CENTRE

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to analyse follow-up and prognostic factors in a series of patients treated for soft tissue tumours as a function of the type of facility providing initial care: a supra-regional referral centre (Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham), and 38 regional hospitals in the referral area.

Material and methods: This series included 260 patients (111 women and 149 men) treated between 1994 and 1996. Mean age at diagnosis was 61 years. Primary care was given to 96 patients (37%) in the referral centre and 164 (63%) in other centres. Minimum follow-up was five years. The risk of local recurrence and survival prognosis were studied by risk factor: grade, localisation (supra versus infra aponeurotic), tumour size, quality of resection margins.

Results: High-grade tumours were found in 73% of patients with a supra-aponeurotic localisation in 59%. Mean tumour size was 8.6 cm. Tumours in patients treated in the referral centre were larger (10.3 cm versus 7.5 cm) (p< 0.05). Frequency of local recurrence was 20% for the referral centre versus 37% for the other centres. Overall five-year survival rate was 58% and was correlated with grade, tumour size, and localisation (p< à.05). Overall survival of patients given primary care in the referral centre was not statistically different from those treated in the other centres, but for high-grade tumours (UICC grade III), five-year survival was 41% for the referral centre and 14% for the other centres (p< 0.05).

Discussion: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumours. For high-grade sarcomas, the rate of recurrence after treatment and the survival rate were better for patients given primary care in the referral centre. The question of centralising patients with this type of disease in referral centres is raised.