COMPARATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF BONE INGROWTH ON THE GUEPAR KNEE PROSTHESIS AND ON A MASSIVE PROSTHESIS WITH AN HYDROXYAPATITE COLLAR

Abstract

Purpose: Hinged knee prostheses are mainly used for reconstruction after major tumour resection. Aseptic loosening is the main problem with these implants. One of the solutions proposed to reduce the rate of loosening is to add a hydroxyapatite collar on the shaft stems. This work was conducted to study bone ingrowth with a new hinged implant with a hydroxyapatite collar at the junction between the zone of resection and the shaft.

Material and methods: Twenty-nine massive prostheses with a hydroxyapatite collar were implanted between 1998 and 2001. Nine patients were excluded from the analysis because follow-up was less than two years. This retrospective analysis thus compared twenty massive prostheses with twenty matched hinged GUEPAR prostheses without a collar. Bony ingrowth was measured on plain x-rays (two orthogonal views) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Filling of the gap between the bone and the implant was also assessed. Signs of loosening were noted.

Results: Mean bony ingrowth in implants with a hydroxyapatite collar was 6.58 mm at 6 months 9.84 mm at 12 months, 12.3 mm at 24 months and 13.25 mm at 36 months. Mean bony ingrowth in the implants without a hydroxyapatite collar was 1.65 mm at 6 months, 3.31 mm at 12 months, 4.8 mm at 24 months and 4.35 mm at 36 months. In the implants with a collar, gap filling was partial in five cases and total in 15. In implants without a collar, there was no gap filling in eight cases, partial filling in two cases and total filling in fifteen cases.

Discussion: Prostheses with a hydroxyapatite collar enable better radiological bony ingrowth than observed in implants without a hydroxyapatite collar. Gap filling is better for prostheses with a collar. There was no case of loosening at last follow-up for implants with a hydroxyapatite collar.

Conclusion: In light of these results, shaft anchorage appears to be better with implants with a hydrosyapatite collar. Confirmation of improvement in clinical outcome and lower rate of aseptic loosening will require longer follow-up.