Abstract
Introduction: Dynesys is a novel, dynamic stabilization system designed for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine that present with unstable motion segments. This system uses pedicle screws with a modular spacer mounted on a stabilising cord, which controls movement of the instrumented segment in all planes. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the biomechanic response of the intervertebral disc (IVD) under normal, flexed and extended loading conditions before and after Dynesys is applied. The IVDs of both the instrumented (bridged) and the adjacent (floating) segment were studied.
Methods: Eight L3–5 cadaveric segments were dissected and compressed to 1kN in 6° flexion, neutral and 4° extension. The test was done without spacers and with spacers measured to +2mm, neutral and −2mm, where neutral equates to the normal distance between the pedicle screws without an applied load. The stress distribution in the mid-sagittal and postero-lateral diameters of both the bridged and floating discs was measured using a miniature pressure transducer. This resulted in greater than 300 stress profiles per specimen. Disc movement and segment motion during loading were recorded using ultrasound imaging and infrared reflection respectively.
Results: Without stabilization, stress peaks observed in the anterior annulus increased by more than 85% as the specimen was loaded from 4° extension to 6°flexion. With the application of Dynesys, these anterior stress peaks were reduced across the bridged segment. This was most pronounced in 6° flexion where anterior stress peaks of greater than 1 MPa were reduced by 100% in the bridged segment in more than 90% of specimens.
Conclusions: The degree of flexion or extension of the specimen during loading influences the peak stresses generated in the annulus. Dynesys has the potential to relieve peak stresses in the anterior annulus which is most pronounced when the specimen is loaded in flexion.
The abstracts were prepared by Editorial Secretary, Dr Charles Pither. Correspondence should be addressed to SBPR at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN
