Abstract
A comparison of the clinical status and outcome of a group of patients treated with tw-stage revision using either excision arthroplasty or an articulating spacer (the Kiwi Prostalac) as the first stage is presented.
Clinical scores were obtained before revision, after the first stage, and after the second stage revision, along with the outcome of the success of the revision procedure in terms of eradication of the infection, from the two study groups. Seven patients received excision arthroplasty and eight were treated with the Kiwi Prostalac spacer, at the treating surgeon’s discretion.
A comparison of the clinical status of the two groups will be presented at the varying stages of treatment, along with hospitalisation duration, and morbidity and ultimate outcome.
Our results demonstrate that two-stage revision with an antibiotic cement-coated THJR prosthesis (The Kiwi Prostalac) is an effective and safe method of managing deep peri-prosthetic infection around a THJR with significant advantages to the patient.
The abstracts were prepared by Jean-Claude Theis. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dunedin Hospital, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin, New Zealand.
