Abstract
We compared initial fixation strength of two commonly used tibial side hamstring ACL reconstruction fixation implants – the RCI interference screw and the Intrafix device.
Using a sheep model 36 hamstring grafts were prepared and implanted into the distal femoral metaphyseal bone using either a RCI screw or an Intrafix device. They were then pulled out until failure using an Instron Materials Testing Machine. Maximum strength of graft fixation and mode of failure were recorded.
The average strength of the graft was 48kg using the RCI screw and 90 kg using the Intrafix device. This difference was statistically significant. The maximum pull-out strength was 91kg for the RCI screw and 130 kg for the Intrafix device. The most common mode of failure in the RCI screw fixation was graft shredding on the screw and whole graft pullout whereas in the Intrafix device it was intratendinous failure.
The Intrafix device demonstrated a clear strength advantage over the RCI screw with regard to initial fixation strength. The Intrafix device may reduce tibial side graft creep which is a problem with hamstring ACL reconstruction.
The abstracts were prepared by Jean-Claude Theis. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dunedin Hospital, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin, New Zealand.
