Abstract
Of 81 elbow replacements performed over a seven-year period, 11 were total elbow revision (TER) procedures, which were done on two men and nine women with a mean age of 61 years (40 to 70). Seven of the patients had rheumatoid arthritis, three had post-traumatic osteoarthritis and one had haemophilia. The reason for revision was aseptic loosening in eight patients and aseptic loosening with fracture in the other three. The prostheses revised were the Souter in eight patients, the Kudo in one, the GSB I in one and the Dee in one. In revision TER, one long stem Souter prosthesis was used, two Pretoria, one GSB 3 and seven Morrey. The mean time from primary to revision TER was 10 years (2 to 31).
At a mean follow-up of 30 months (6 to 48), all except one patient were pain-free and the arc of flexion had increased by 30°. Complications included one dislocation, one radial nerve palsy, which recovered after six months, and one aseptic loosening. There were no cases of sepsis.
Revision TER is a technically demanding procedure with a high risk of complications. In this series patient satisfaction was high. Our policy is to use a hinged prosthesis, preferably the Morrey, in revision TER.
The abstracts were prepared by Professor M. B. E. Sweet. Correspondence should be addressed to him at PO Box 47363, Parklands, Johannesburg 2121, South Africa.
