Abstract
Introduction Both congenital and acquired aetiologies for Os Odontoideum have been proposed leading to confusion in a medico-legal setting. No large series with CT and MRI features has been reported.
Methods Clinical, radiological, CT and MRI data from 25 cases of cranio-cervical anomalies (including 18 with Os Odontoideum) was collected prospectively. The hypothesis that Os Odontoideum is associated with signs of dysplasia such as arch hypertrophy (as quantified by the arch-peg ratio) and a ‘jigsaw’ like atlanto-dens joint configuration was tested.
Results Only one of 18 cases with Os Odontoideum gave a history of remote trauma. None of the cases with other post traumatic conditions showed arch hypertrophy or dysplasia of the joint. Os Odontoideum was associated with two distinctive features on mid-sagittal CT reconstruction: arch hypertrophy and the presence of a ‘jigsaw sign’. A quantitative definition of arch hypertrophy (an arch/ peg ratio greater than 0.5) provided a sensitive and specific test for Os Odontoideum. This was further enhanced in combination with the jigsaw sign to give a test accuracy of 97%. Motor changes with MRI signs of cord damage were observed in one of 12 cases associated with trauma.
Conclusions The lack of a history of remote trauma and the dyplastic atlanto-dens joint seen on CT are more suggestive of a congenital than a post-traumatic aetiology for Os Odontoideum. Patients with Os odontoideum are able to tolerate moderate to severe levels of injury without sustaining significant acute cord damage.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.
