header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CRANIOCERVICAL DISSOCIATION, ONE INSTITUTION’S EXPERIENCE WITH 17 SURVIVORS OVER SEVEN YEARS



Abstract

Introduciton Diagnosis of cranio-cervical dissociaton is frequently delayed, and neurological consequences may be severe. Our purpose was to identify problems with the diagnosis and treatment of craniocervical dissociation, while reporting the results of early craniocervical fusion with posterior segmental fixation.

Methods We present a retrospective review of 17 survivors of cranio-cervical dissociation identified through institutional spine and trauma registries. Medical records, radiographs, and prospectively collected data were used to identify the timing and method of diagnosis, and the effect of delayed diagnosis. Radiographic and clinical results of treatment were evaluated. Emphasis was placed on identifying missed or delayed diagnoses, decline in neurologic function, potential clinical or radiographic warning signs, and response to treatment.

Results Despite an abnormal Basion-Dens relationship in all but one patient, cranio-cervical dissociation was identified or suspected on the initial lateral cervical spine radiograph in only two patients (12%), and was diagnosed in only four patients (24%) following initial trauma evaluation (lateral radiograph and CT of cervical spine). The two day average delay in diagnosis was associated with profound neurologic deterioration in five patients. One patient had post-operative neurologic worsening. No patients developed craniocervical pseudarthrosis or hardware failure after a 15-month average follow-up period. The mean ASIA motor score of 50 improved to seven, and the number of patients with useful motor function (ASIA D or E) increased from seven patients (41%) pre-operatively to 13 (76%) post-operatively. The typical patient profile was of a polytraumatized patient with associated head injuriy, cranio-facial trauma, and asymmetric motor deficits extending above the C5 level.

Conclusions Better clinician awareness and disciplined review of screening C-spine radiographs are important for prompt diagnosis and stabilization of craniocervical instability. Of 17 patients with CCD necessitating internal fixation (stage two and three), 13 had a delay in diagnosis either at our institution or the transferring hospital, with severe neurological consequences in five patients. Significant recovery of neurologic function was a consistent post-operative finding, confirming the importance of prompt diagnosis and operative stabilization of these devastating injuries.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.