Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of impaction bone grafting for the restoration of glenoid bone stock in revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Methods There was significant osteolysis around the glenoid component in four rheumatoid patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty using this technique. The criteria was a contained or containable defect. Femoral head allograft and iliac crest autograft harvested at the time of revision were used. Pre and post-operative radiographs, tomograms and fluoroscopic views aided in bone-stock analysis. Images were analysed for osteolysis, graft survival, incorporation and component loosening. Patients were followed using Constant-Murley scoring pre-operatively, and at a minimum of 12 months. The average patient age was 56 years (range 42 to 76), with three females and one male patient.
Results Glenoid component survivorship pre-revision averaged 9.5 years (range 8 to 12). The pre-operative Constant-Murley average was 11 (range 4 to 20) versus 64 post-operatively, a significant improvement over an average follow-up of 19.5 months (range 12 to 40). Radiological assessment demonstrated all grafts had incorporated with minimal subsidence and no radio-lucency at the graft-bone interface. Two of the glenoid components demonstrated static lucency at the component-graft interface, but no component movement on serial x-rays. In both patients the significant improvement in functional was maintained.
Conclusions To our knowledge this technique has not been described in glenoid component revision. It successfully provided bone for glenoid component insertion. This would not have been possible using standard techniques. The early results for this technique are encouraging and justify the continued application and follow-up of glenoid impaction grafting.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.
