Abstract
Introduction Paget’s disease of bone is a common disorder characterised by focal areas of increased bone resorption by osteoclasts and disorganised bone formation by osteoblasts. Because there is integral cross-talk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts during normal bone remodelling, we propose that Pagetic osteoblasts may also play a key role in the pathogenesis of Paget’s disease. Any phenotypic changes in the diseased osteoblasts are likely to result from alterations in the expression levels of specific genes.
Methods To determine any differences in expression between Pagetic and non-Pagetic osteoblasts and their precursors the gene expression profiles of RANK, RANKL, OPG, VEGF, IL-1beta, IL-6, MIP-1, TNF and M-CSF were investigated in primary cell cultures of human osteoblasts and in the osteoblast precursor population of bone marrow stromal cells. Trabecular bone explants were finely chopped, washed free of marrow and cellular debris then either snap frozen in liquid nitrogen or placed in flasks to culture outgrowth osteoblast-like cells. Mononuclear stromal cells from bone marrow were isolated and grown in culture flasks. RNA and conditioned media were collected from cultured osteoblasts and stromal cells at confluency. Real-Time PCR was used for the comparison of gene expression. 18S ribosomal RNA was used as an endogenous control to normalise the expression in the various samples.
Results RANK, MIP-1 and TNF were only detected in stromal cells whereas RANKL, OPG, VEGF, IL-1beta, IL-6 and M-CSF were detected in both osteoblasts and stromal cells. OPG displayed higher expression in osteoblasts while IL-1beta showed higher expression in stromal cells. To-date we have not seen any significant differences in gene expression between pagetic and non-pagetic subjects when comparing a small number of samples. A larger cohort is currently being investigated. Mutations in the sequestosome 1 gene have been showed to be associated with Paget’s disease. When a small number of Pagetic samples were sequenced for these mutations we found one out of seven patients (14%) to possess a known transition mutation at position 1215 in this gene.
Conclusions These results may further our understanding of the pathology of Paget’s disease.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.
None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.
