Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BIOPSY OF MUSCULO-SKELETAL TUMOURS, BEWARE THE DANGER



Abstract

Introduction Patients with musculo-skeletal tumours require appropriate staging investigations followed by prompt treatment. Biopsy of these lesions is hazardous and, when poorly performed, may compromise limb salvage surgery and patient survival. We examine the early management of such patients referred to our unit with particular reference to the biopsy.

Methods We conducted a prospective audit of all patients referred to our musculo-skeletal tumour service during 2002. Inclusion criteria were patients with a tumour of the musculo-skeletal system of unknown tissue diagnosis at presentation. Biopsies were performed either by the referring surgeon or the senior author. Patient demographics were recorded as well as details of the histological diagnosis, the site of the tumour and its stage. We recorded who performed the biopsy, the type of biopsy, the choice of biopsy site, whether or not adequate material was obtained and whether or not a poorly performed biopsy compromised the definitive treatment. We saw 162 patients (83 men and 79 women) with a mean age of 41 years (6 to 85). There were 81 primary bone tumours of which 40 were malignant, 58 primary soft tissue tumours of which 29 were malignant, 15 metastases from unknown primary tumours and eight haematological malignancies. One hundred and thirty-nine tumours were in the extremities, 12 pelvic, six trunk and six spinal. We saw patients at a mean of 11 days after receiving the referral letter. Of the 69 primary malignant tumours we saw 60 (87%) within two weeks and 67 (97%) within four weeks. The referring surgeon had performed biopsies in 29 cases.

Results Of the tumours biopsied by other surgeons, adequate diagnostic material was obtained in 75% compared to 99% in those biopsied by us. The biopsy site was suboptimal in 11/29 (38%). Fine needle aspiration (FNA) had been performed in 7/29 with only two (29%) providing diagnostic material. Poorly performed biopsy changed our definitive treatment in 5/29 (17%). Of those four had amputations and one patient received radiotherapy instead of further surgery. Twelve of 29 (41%) patients required re-excision of an incompletely excised tumour.

Conclusions Biopsies taken from sub-optimal sites may contaminate surrounding tissues, are frequently non-diagnostic and may compromise limb salvage surgery. FNA is particularly unreliable. We conclude that these patients are best served by early referral to a specialist centre where the biopsy can be performed quickly, safely and accurately.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.