Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

LOW IN VIVO WEAR WITH CROSS LINKED POLYETHYLENE IN METAL BACKED CUPS



Abstract

Introduction Wear particle induced osteolysis is regarded as the main reason for aseptic loosening of hip replacements. Crosslinked polyethylene show extremely low wear in lab studies and is routinely used today, though with very little clinical testing. We report wear, migration and function for uncemented cups with a crosslinked poly.

Methods Twelve hips in 12 patients with mean age of 70 years were operated with uncemented cups (Reflection), cemented stems and metal heads. Five Mrad cross linked liners annealed below melt temperature were used in all hips (XLPE, Smith & Nephew). Tantalum markers were inserted in liners and acetabular bone for RSA measurements and migration and wear measured over two years. The result was compared to matched controls from a study of 80 cups with the same implant and non cross linked poly, operated by the same surgeon. X-rays, WOMAC and Sf-36 were performed pre-operatively and at two years.

Results The mean proximal head penetration at two months was 0.09 mm. This was thought to be mainly due to the creep of the polyethylene and was equal to “normal” poly. At the one year follow-up the mean proximal wear had increased with 0.02 mm and at two years 0.03 mm. This compares with the 0.33 mm recorded for the old poly (p=0.001, Mann Whitney U test.). The cups migrated 0.2 mm proximally and showed a normal migration profile, comparable to the cups with non cross-linked poly. The accuracy of measuring proximal wear, in this study, was found to be 0.07 mm (95% CI). No differences in radiolucent lines or clinical scores were found.

Conclusions The first two years proximal wear was 0.03 mm compared to the 0.33 mm found for non crosslinked poly. This is a reduction with 90% which certainly looks promising.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Jerzy Sikorski. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Australian Orthopaedic Association, Ground Floor, William Bland Centre, 229 Macquarie Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.

None of the authors have received any payment or consideration from any source for the conduct of this study.