header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

MASSIVE SPINAL EPIDURAL HAEMATOMA CAUSING NEUROLOGIGAL DEFICIT IN AN ANTICOAGULATED PATIENT TREATED NON OPERATIVELY



Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma is an uncommon clinical problem which may lead to severe and permanent neurological deficit. The treatment options for spinal cord compression by extradural haematoma in the anticoagulated patient are limited. The majority of cases reported have been treated surgically.1 Operative intervention carries a potential risk of extending the haematoma with further deterioration of the neurological deficit.

Methods: A case of paraplegia following spontaneous epidural haemorrhage is reported with a review of the prognostic factors that determine likely improvement in neurological function post-surgery.

Case report: A 59-year old man was referred to the regional Spinal Trauma Centre with a 34-hour history of severe lower back pain of sudden onset and 14 hour history of neurological deficit in both legs and urinary overflow incontinence. He had undergone aortic valve replacement two years previously, with subsequent anticoagulation with Warfarin. Examination showed complete paraplegia below L3 with grade 1 power on hip flexion only. On catheterisation, the residual volume of urine was 1200mls. The INR was 3.5. An MRI of the spine showed epidural haematoma that extended from the level of T11 to L5.

The patient was treated non-operatively. On discharge at 10 weeks he had normal sensation to L3 and grade 5-power on left knee extension and grade 4-power on the right. There was no motor recovery distal to this. He had a hypotonic neurological bladder with sufficient resting tone in the sphincter to prevent incontinence.

Discussion: Although associated with a definite mortality, surgical decompression of the spinal cord and evacuation of the haematoma improves neurological outcome and is the treatment of choice.1 The decision to treat non-operatively should be based on the duration and severity of the neurological deficit. A literature review identifies neurological deficit greater than 12 hours and severe neurological deficit on presentation are poor prognostic indicators.2 The prognosis for neurological recovery in this case was poor. In a patient with severe coexisting medical problems these factors can assist when making the decision to operate on an individual patient with spinal epidural haematoma.

The abstracts were prepared by I. B. McPhee. Correspondence should be addressed to the Spine Society of Australia Secretariat, The Adelaide Centre for Spinal Research, Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, PO Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia.

References:

1 Kreppel D, Seeling W. Spinal hematoma: a literature survey with meta-analysis of 613 patients. Neurosurg Rev2003; 26: 1–49 Google Scholar

2 Lawton MT, Porter RW, Heiserman JE, et al. Surgical management of spinal epidural haematoma: relationship between surgical timing and neurological outcome. J Neurosurg1995; 83: 1–7 Google Scholar