Abstract
Advantages of custom made prosthesis are the 3D-Planing and correction of the head position using the best possible form fit. Considering these properties we examined several off the shelf systems if they can fulfil the requirements to form fit and head position. By using our fit program we simulated the implantation of five different off the shelf systems in more than 200 individual reconstructed femora. The data of these bones were used for constructing a custom made implant, so the best form fit and head position could be compared with the result of the fit. All of the patients were younger than 65 years. The data of the off the shelf prostheses systems came from 3D measurement. All systems were described as anatomical.
The fit program is an optimization program which can implant a 3D prosthesis model in a reconstructed 3D femur by variation of all six special parameters simultaneously.
Compared to the demands of our custom implants, the results of the virtual implantation of the off the shelf systems, are more or less unsatisfactory. Depending on the acceptable tolerance of the limits in offset, leg lengthening and anteversion up to 50% of the patients could not be treated with a single off the shelf system, when the best form fit was reached sufficiently. Using the results of this examination we enlarged our custom-made prosthesis system with six different sizes of an anatomical like off the shelf prostheses. By perfoming the same fit simulation with our new implants we found that more than 70% of our patients could be treated with this implant sufficiently, when using the same limits.
A good correspondence was found between the computer fit, which was calculated in advance, and the postoperative situation. The combined system of custom and off the shelf prostheses in addition with our 3D planning system based on CT examination, leads to new way of choosing the best implant for a single patient. If the virtual implantation of an off the shelf system does not give a satisfying result, the custom-made CTX prosthesis will be chosen for this patient.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
