Abstract
We have been using a Charnley type hip prosthesis with an alumina ceramic head. Three sizes of alumina head, 28, 26 and 22mm, were employed and the Ortron 90 Charnley total hip prosthesis was used at the same period. The objective of this study was to compare the survival rate and the wear rate of those four groups. There were 90, 62, 322 and 88 hips in 28, 26, 22mm alumina head and 0rtron 90 head group. Average age at operation was 49.5, 57.8, 58.0 and 60.6, respectively. A 28 mm prosthesis was indicated for relatively young patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 156, 97, 49 and 110 months, respectively. Twenty patients were chosen at random for each of four groups and the linear wear as seen on X-ray film was measured every two years with a computer and scanner.
Results: The average linear wear rate (mm/yr) was 0.179 for the 28mm, 0.112 for the 26mm, 0.115 for the 22mm alumina head and 0.075 for the Ortron 90 head. The difference between the 28mm group and the other three groups was analyzed statistically. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint, showed the survival rate of the 28mm group appeared to be inferior to that of the other three groups.
Discussion: Our study showed that the wear rate of the 28mm alumina group was highest because low grade alumina was used. In addition, the polyethylene socket used for the 28mm group was thinner than that for the other groups. No clinical superiority of ceramics to metal in terms of polyethylene wear can be shown in this study. A randomized prospective study should be carried out to determine whether an alumina ceramic head is clinically superior to a metallic head in terms of polyethylene wear.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
