header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

FRICTION OF RETRIEVED HIP PROSTHESES



Abstract

Friction was studied in 67 retrieved cemented cups with 32 mm internal diameter. Friction was measured under 1.0 KN of static load. High molecular hyaluronic acid was adapted as a lubricant. Thirty cups were combined with alumina heads and 37 were combined with metal heads. The years cups were in situ was 7.5 (3.2–13.2) for alumina-polyethylene implants and 8.9 (1.5–15.7) for metal-polyethylene implants (p> 0.05).

The revision rate at 15 years follow-up was higher in metal-polyethylene (PE) implants (57%) than that of alumina-PE implants (40%) (p< 0.05). The prevalence of cup loosening was less in alumina-PE implants (12/30) than in metal-PE implants (29/37) (p< 0.01). Less wear was observed in alumina-PE implants (1.15+−0,80mm) than in metal-PE implants (1.62+−0.61mm) (p< 0.01). Less wear was observed in cups without loosening (alumina-PE implants: 1.84+−0.57mm, metal-PE implants: 1.75+−0.51mm) than in those with loosening (alumina-PE implants: 0.69+−0.56mm, metal-PE implants: 1.31+−0.73mm) in both types (alumina-PE implants: p< 0.01, metal-PE implants: p< 0.05). Less wear rate was observed in cups without loosening (alumina-PE implants: 0.11+−0.05 mm/year, metal-PE implants: 0.14+−0.05mm/year) than in those with loosening (alumina-PE implants: 0.17+−0.03 mm/year, metal-PE implants: 0.22+−0.09mm/year) in both types (alumina-PE implants: p< 0.01, metal-PE implants: p< 0.05). The coefficient of friction increased in proportion to the progress of cup wear in both types (alumina-PE implants: r2 =0.217, p< 0.01, metal-PE implants: r2 =0.183, p< 0.01). Relation between the coefficient of friction and stability of implants was not detected in both types, while alumina-PE implants had lower coefficient of friction (0.137+-0.056) than metal-PE implants (0.209+−0.098) (p< 0.01). The torque of metal-PE implants without stem loosening (0.137+−0.053) was larger than that of alumina-PE implants with stem loosening (0.274+−0.088) (p< 0.01).

The results suggest that wear has greater influence on stability of implants than the friction, whereas coefficient of friction increases in worn implants.

The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.