Abstract
The study was designed to compare the clinical performance of an Alumina ceramic acetabular bearing to that of a polyethylene bearing in a cementless hip couple.
The study group consisted of 15 surgeons who performed 308 total hip replacements (297 patients) between January 29, 1998 and February 1, 2000. All patients received a porous coated cementless titanium stem with an Alumina ceramic 28 mm or 32 mm head. Patients were randomized to receive a porous titanium acetabular shell with either a polyethylene or Alumina cup liner. There were 164 Alumina cups and 144 polyethylene cups. The mean age was 57.3 years and consisted of 50% males and 50% females. The preoperative diagnoses were: osteoarthritis 69.8%, avascular necrosis 19.5 %, post traumatic arthritis 2.9 %, inflammatory arthritis 3.9% and other 3.9%. The mean follow up was 12 months. The longest follow up was 38 months.
The Harris Hip Score was good and excellent in 86% of the control patients and 87% of the study patients. There has been 100% follow up and survivorship.
There were two reoperations for recurrent dislocations in each group. There were no Alumina component fractures, no progressive radiolucencies and no evidence of rapid wear.
In the short term follow-up between 12 and 38 months, there do not appear to be any differences between the patients with a bearing couple consisting of Alumina on plastic with those consisting of Alumina on Alumina. There have been no catastrophic failures of the ceramic components. The Alumina/Alumina bearing couple for total hip arthroplasty appears to be an excellent alternative bearing, providing the advantage of improved long term wear and a reduced incidence of polyethylene induced osteolysis.
The abstracts were prepared by Nico Verdonschot. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
