Abstract
Aims: Various techniques for the þxation of the posterior pelvis have been used, each demonstrating drawbacks speciþc to the technique. In this study, a new protocol was described and evaluated, involving the placement of posterior pelvic screws in the computed tomography (CT) room. Methods: Between September 2001 and September 2002, sixteen patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries were stabilized with iliosacral screws under the CT guided technique, using only local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Patients with displaced fractures initially had their anterior lesion addressed with ORIF or external þxation. The posterior lesion was assessed again and if satisfactorily reduced was treated with the CT guided procedure. In addition to routine demographic data, we evaluated patient pain using an analog scale (0–10), time required per screw, radiation dosage, amount of local anesthesia and sedation required, complications, adequacy of fracture reduction and healing, and accuracy of screw placement. Results: In 16 patients we used 22 screws. The time for the procedure averaged 36 minutes per screw. There were no technical difþculties, logistical problems, or misplaced screws in any patient. There were no infections or non-unions. During ofþce follow up, all patients stated that they would choose to have the CT scan procedure again versus an operating room procedure requiring general anesthesia. Conclusion: CT guided placement of iliosacral screws is a safe, feasible, and alternative to ßuoroscopy guided placement in the operating room in selected cases.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
