O3026 REVISION TKR WITH THE PFC/TC3 SYSTEM – DOES THE JOINT LINE MATTER?

Abstract

Aim: To assess the functional results of revision TKR with the PFC/TC3 system, and to correlate this with the reasons for revision and restoration of joint height. Method: 153 patients underwent revision TKR using the PFC/TC3 system. Data was prospectively collected (using the Bristol Knee Score) pre-operatively and at a mean of 4.2 years post-revision. 43 revisions were for infection and 81 revisions were for aseptic loosening. Measurements of the joint height were made pre and post-operatively using FiggieÔs method and were divided into 3 groups: lower by more than 5mm, restored and elevated more than 5mm. Use of distal augments and polyethylene thickness were recorded. Results: The mean pre-op function score was 12 and post-operatively was 19 for the infection group and 20 for the aseptic loosening group. Revision after initial UKR gave a mean score of 21, while revision after TKR gave a mean score of 18 (max 27). Knees in which the joint line was elevated by more than 5 mm had a mean score of 17 while those where the joint line was restored had a mean score of 19. Recent increasing use of distal augments improved the joint line and results. Conclusion: revision using the PFC/TC3 system produced acceptable medium term functional results and good survival. Better restoration of joint line and functional results were achieved by distal femoral rather than proximal tibial augmentation.