Abstract
Aims: New threshold levels for a classification of Harris hip score (HHS) with respect to patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty (THA) were calculated. Methods: Registry data from four follow-up intervals (< =3, 3–6, 6–9, > 9 years) from 3824 female and 4002 male patients were analyzed and optimal agreements between patient satisfaction and HHS classes were calculated using kappa values (κ). Patients were classified into Charnley classes A and B/C. HHS outcome was transformed into a binary format (positive, negative). Results: Associations between outcomes of the complete patient group using the normal HHS-classification (100, 90, 80,< 70) were weak (κ≤ 0.42). For a binary outcome classification with positive (excellent, good) and negative (fair, poor) results, associations improved especially for Charnley A patients (κ=0.46). Using the recalibrated HHS, the separation of patients in Charnley A vs. B/C and a binary outcome classification resulted in clear associations between HHS results and patient evaluation in both groups A (κ=0.527) and B/C (κ=0.424). The new thresholds were 95 (good), 75 (fair) and 65 (poor) for Charnley A and 95, 75 and 60 for Charnley B/C respectively. Conclusions: The newly calibrated HHS can differentiate between a patient perceived positive and a negative outcome in Charnley A and B/C patients. The differentiation between these two groups is essential since Charnley B and C patients have, by definition, an inferior mobility compared to Charnley A patients which can render a successful THA as fair and poor in many of those patients if the traditional HHS classification is applied.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
