Abstract
Aims:ACL revision surgery is a second-generation type of knee ligament surgery. The artificial ligaments, the imperfect mastering of arthoscopic assisted surgery and the absence of clinical and radiological analysis of peripheral laxities are among the main factors for failures. Methods:43 patients of a mean age of 29y were previously operated between 1 and 5 times.14 artificial ligaments, 23 patellar tendons and 4 hamstrings tendons failed as a first ACL reconstruction. The mean time between the first operation and the index revision was 44 months. In 6 cases an additional HTO was used. Different tendon grafts were used: quadriceps 11, patellar 19 and hamstrings 8. In 3 occasions an additional extra articular reefing was used. The patients were reviewed by one independent observer using KT 1000, Stress X rays, IKDC form (2000). The mean follow up is 35 months (11–123)Results:The IKDC score in pre operative time was 19 D, 21 C and 1B. At the review the score is 2A, 28 B, 9C, 2D. The functional IKDC form show 37.5% of remaining pain, 44% of stiffness sensation and 12.5% of instability. The mean functional improvement is 44%. The mean laxity improvement is 5.3mm for KT1000 and 4.5mm for stress X rays. Conclusions:Revision ACL surgery is not as good as primary surgery. The reconstruction is technically difficult and must be ‘à la carte’ in order to take in account several simultaneous problems: bone defect, cartilage abnormalities, skin and ligament insufficiencies.
Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.
