Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

S2021 SEVERE TIBIAL FRACTURES: CLASSIFICATION, DIAGNOSTICS, TREATMENT OPTIONS INCLUDING THE CHANGING OF METHODS



Abstract

Per definition we distinguish between shaft fractures of the tibia and fibula (lower leg), proximal tibial fractures, distal tibial fractures and isolated tibial shaft fractures. There are different criteria to classify a tibial fracture: 1. age, 2. soft tissue damage. Not only the terms, “open” and, “closed” but also coexistent neurovascular damage and the presence of a compartment syndrome have to be mentioned. 3. Furthermore there are well known anatomical classifications of tibial fractures (AO, OTA). Special conditions, as osteoporosis, osteopenia, pathological fractures and osteogenesis imperfecta have to be recognized.

The optimal treatment concept depends on the correct diagnosis, the manifestation of priorities, calculation of risks, management of complications and rehabilitation.

The treatment options of severe tibial fractures are: The interlocking nail in reamed or unreamed technique, the external fixator and in very rare cases plating or screw fixation.

The following principles in the treatment of severe tibial fractures should be mentioned:

The method of choice in closed and I° open tibial fractures is the reamed intramedullary nailing. If there is a coexistent fibular fracture at the same level as the tibial fracture, plating of the fibula should be performed.

The preferred method in closed tibial fractures with moderate soft tissue damage and in II° open tibial fractures is the unreamed interlocking nailing.

The closed tibial fracture with severe soft tissue damage as well as the III° open fracture are preferable treated by external fixation. The changing to intamedullary stabilization should be included in the therapeutic plan, primarily, or should be indicated later on.

Plating (ORIF) of severe tibial fractures has become a very rare performed procedure and is presently done just in some special exemptions. A complementary osteo-synthesis, including nailing and plating, is not included in our therapeutic concept. Proximal and distal tibial fractures involving the joint surface are not included in this consideration.

The indication for fasciotomy must not be too restrictive. A compartment syndrome should not prevent intramedullary nailing and a standardized protocol for second look procedures to protect bone and soft tissue has to be made.

In children the method of choice in severe tibial fractures is the external fixation The own experiences, during a three year period (1999–2001), including 208 tibial/ fibular shaft fractures are presented. We had 77% closed and 23% open fractures. Overall 90% were treated by intramedullary nailing. In the open fractures, we fixed all I° open fractures by nailing and 56% of the II° open fractures. 67% of III°a fractures, 90% of III°b and all III°c fractures were initially stabilized by external fixation.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Dr. Frantz Langlais. Correspondence should be addressed to him at EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.