Abstract
Introduction: Common misconceptions about distal radius fractures result in undertreatment, particularly in active population.Loss of reduction can cause a symptomatic malunion. The aim of the study is to present the clinical consequences of a dorsally malunited distal radius fractures and the results of a corrective osteotomy for the treatment of this problem
Material: 18 patients with distal radius fractures healed in a dorsal angulation and a mean age of 39 years, treated with a corrective osteotomy. 13 patients had been treated by closed means, and 5 had undergone a earlier surgical procedures without success. 11 patients had a DISI instability of the wrist. 12 patients underwent a radius corrective osteotomy alone, 4 had a cpmined radial osteotomy amd ulnar shortening osteotomy, and 2 underwent only a Sauve-Kapandji procedure.
Results: The average follow up was 26 months. All the osteotomies healed. 15 of the deformities were corrected. 7 patients with DISI deformity were regained normal wrists whereas the rest 4 remained with DISI instability. One patient with normal wrist led to DISI instability postop.
Conclusion: Distal radius corrective osteotomy is a technically demanding operation, and by no means can guarantee a postop normal anatomy. Furthermore and despite the functional improvement it is unknown the remote consequences wth a ersidual DISI deformity.
The abstracts were prepared by Eleni Koutsoukou. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Hellenic Association of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (HAOST), 20, A. Fleming str, 15123 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
