HYBRID FIXATION OF PILON FRACTURES. IS THE FIXATION OF THE FIBULA NECESSARY?

Abstract

Fibular plating comprises a major component in the treatment of Pilon fractures with open reduction and internal fixation. However, its necessity when Pilon fractures are treated by hybrid fixation has been questioned. A retrospective clinical study with 65 high energy pilon fractures treated by circular fixators between 1996 and 2001 was undertaken, in order to clarify this technical detail. The mean age was 35 years (range 21 to 69 years). The fractures were classified according to the systems of Ruedi -Allgower (9 II, 56 III) and Ovadia-Beals (9 II, 21 III, 13 IV, 22 V). Hybrid fixation (tension wire fixation at the fracture site augmented by screws) was performed in 39 fractures. The lateral malleolus was internally fixed in 39(60%) patients. In 48(74%) patients the fixation was extended to the calcaneus for 6 weeks. The metaphyseal defect (25 fractures, 38.5%) was treated by grafting in fourteen, acute shortening in six, and bone transport in five fractures. Clinical and radiological results were evaluated.

Mean follow up was 3 years (range 1 to 10 years). On the basis of Ruedi-Allgower system, there was a negative correlation between the end result and fibular fixation in all the fractures types (p< 0.001). However, if Ovadia Beals system was used, fibular fixation was associated with better results in type II and III, but with inferior results in type IV and V.

We conclude that in fractures with metaphyseal defect, fibular fixation does not allow acute shortening and makes bone transport more difficult leading to poor results. Ovadia – Beals classification considers the metaphyseal defect and the fracture comminution and should be chosen for the selection of the technique. Fibular plating is desirable for types II and III but it should be avoided or at least not preceded for types IV and V.