Abstract
This study was designed to assess the standard of orthopaedic training of Senior House Officers in the U.K. and to determine the optimum time that should be spent in these posts before registrar training.
Two MCQ papers were constructed. One for the pre test and one for the post test. Questions covered all aspects of orthopaedics and trauma including operative surgery. The paper was firstly tested on controls including medical students, house officers, registrars of various grades and consultants. There was no statistical difference in the results for the two papers within the groups indicating that pre and post test papers were of similar standard. In addition the average scores in the tests increased proportionately to the experience and grade of the control.
129 SHOs from 25 hospitals in 10 different regions were tested by MCQ examination at the beginning of their 6-month post. They were again tested at the end of the job. The differences in score were compared. This difference was then correlated with the experience and career intention of the SHO.
There was no statistical difference between pre and post test results in all groups of SHOs in the study (student t test). The best improvement in scores during this six month period were seen in SHOs of 1–1.5 years orthopaedic experience. SHOs of more than 3 years experience demonstrated the smallest improvement in their score. There was a net loss of seven trainees with a career intention of orthopaedics to other disciplines.
In the vast majority of Senior House Officer posts in this country, very little seems to be learnt during a six-month attachment. This is especially so for those who are doing orthopaedics for the first time as well as very experienced SHOs.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Richard Buxton. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Bankton Cottage, 21 Bankton Park, Kingskettle, Cupar, Fife KY15 7PY, United Kingdom
