Abstract
We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and predictive value of palpation, of the painful arc sign, and of the ‘Royal London Hospital test’ in 10 patients with Achilles tendinopathy, and in 14 asymptomatic subjects using a test-retest study design.
Ten male athletes on the waiting list for exploration of one of their Achilles tendons for tendinopathy of the main body of the tenon attended a special clinic. Each was invited to bring at least one athlete of the same sex in the same discipline aged within two years of themselves, with no history and no symptoms of AT. A total of 14 controls were thus recruited.
Pain and tenderness following performance of palpation, the painful arc sign, and the ‘Royal London Hospital test’ were recorded.
There were no statistically significant differences at the 5% level among the effects of investigator or between morning and afternoon measurements for any of the three assessment methods. There was no evidence of a difference of the three assessment methods (p> 0.05). When the three methods were combined, the overall sensitivity was 0.586 (CI 0.469 – 0.741) and the overall specificity was 0.833 (CI 0.758 – 0.889).
In patients with tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon with a tender area of intratendinous swelling which moves with the tendon and whose tenderness significantly decreases or disappears when the tendon is put under tension, a clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy can be formulated, with a high positive predictive chance that the tendon will show ultrasonographic and histological features of tendinopathy.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Richard Buxton. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Bankton Cottage, 21 Bankton Park, Kingskettle, Cupar, Fife KY15 7PY, United Kingdom
