Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

SURVIVORSHIP OF THE LOW CONTACT STRESS TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – A FIVE TO EIGHT YEAR REVIEW



Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty has evolved considerably over the last thirty years. Early implant design achieved the short-term goals of pain relief and mobility, however loosening and polyethylene wear associated with over constraint was problematic. The Low Contact Stress total knee arthroplasty was developed in an attempt to address the problems of loosening and polyethylene wear. The highly congruent interface between the femoral component and the mobile insert minimises stress within the polyethylene and reduces the potential of wear and damage. Furthermore, the mobile bearing phenomenon minimises both torsional and shear stresses at the component bone interface. In our unit the impact of choice is the LCS rotating platform prosthesis, which is inserted with cruciate-sacrifice.

We reviewed 219 patients (272 knees) with an average follow-up of 6 years (5–8 years). In almost all cases the components were inserted with cement fixation. The patella was primarily resurfaced in 20 patients (21 knees). All operations were performed or supervised by the senior author. Female to male ratio was 2:1. Average age at surgery was 68 years (40–86) with osteoarthritis being the commonest primary diagnosis (89%). Postoperative range of motion ranges from 30–130° (average 103°). Average Oxford Knee, American Knee Society Score and Patellar Score was 19 (12–53), 160 (42–199) and 25 (4–30) respectively. Six patients (1.7%) required MUA at six weeks. Two patients (0.6%) required secondary patellar resurfacing. Three patients (0.8%) had revision of their components for persistent pain. At operation all components were noted to be well fixed. Spinout of the rotating platform occurred in one patient (0.3%). This was treated by exchange of the insert.

In conclusion, our early results of the LCS rotating platform prosthesis are encouraging with no cases of component loosening to date. This supports the continued use of the implant.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Ray Moran. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Irish Orthopaedic Associaton, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11.