Abstract
Aim of study
The thrust plate prosthesis is an implantat with metaphyseal fixation at the proximal femur, which leaves the diaphyseal bone untouched. Therefore this implant preferably is employed in younger patients. It is dependent on a good bone quality in the proximal femur. Because bone quality is reduced in patients with polyarthritis, this kind of endoprosthesis may have a higher failer rate than conventional stemmed endoprostheses in these patients. Therefore in patients with polyarthritis even short- end midterm results of the thrust plate prosthesis should be analyzed.
Material and Methods
47 thrust plate prostheses were implanted in 42 patients with polyarthritis (29 with rheumatoid arthritis, 6 with juvenile chronic arthritis and 7 patients with spondarthritis) and followed prospectively. The average age at the operation was 40. 8 ± 10. 7 years. Each patient was clinically and radiologically examined preoperative, 3 and 6 months after the operation and at the end of each postoperative year. The mean follow-up was 26. 1 ± 10. 7 months. The clinical findings were evaluated using the Harris-Hip-Score. Radiologically 8 different zones at the thrust plate prosthesis were analyzed for radiolucencies.
Results
During the first year the Harris-Hip-Score rose continuously from the preoperative average of 42. 4 ± 6. 5 points to 78. 8 ± 10. 3 points 3 months postoperatively, 82. 3 ± 9. 8 points 6 months postoperatively, and 86. 8 ± 10. 1 points 1 year after the operation. The following examinations showed Harris-Hip-Scores at the same level. 5 patients (5 joints, 10. 6%) had to undergo a revision of the thrust plate prosthesis due to aseptic loosening in 3 cases and septic loosening in 2 cases. 6 prostheses (12. 6 %) showed radiolucencies, mostly below the thrust plate in zone 1 and 2. 2 of these prostheses were certainly radiologically loose which raised the failure rate to 7 of 47 (14. 8 %).
Conclusion
The thrust plate prosthesis improves function and pain in patients with polyarthritis to a satisfactory degree. Concerning the failure rate this type seems to yield slightly worse results than cementless stemmed endoprostheses in the same patient group. Due to the preservation of the diaphysial bone of the femur and the possibility of an unproblematic change to a stemmed endoprosthesis the thrust plate prosthesis keeps its indication in younger patients with polyarthritis.
