Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) of a single arthritic tibio femoral compartment can slow the progression of arthritis to the other compartment.
Method: Since 1974, a prospective database has been established in Bristol to register and follow up the results of unicompartmental knee replacement. Forty two prostheses that had survived for more than 10 years were examined using the Ahlbach radiological scoring system and compared to a control group of patients from the Bristol “OA 500” series, in which patients being treated conservatively for gonarthritis were regularly reviewed by clinical scoring and radiological analysis. The groups were sex matched.
All AP and lateral standing knee radiographs at entry and 8 years were scored using the Ahlbach scoring system. The Ahlbach system has been shown to have good inter and intra observer correlation, and to relate closely to pathological findings at operation. An intra and inter observer error study of our results confirmed good correlation.
Results: The groups were well matched but the OA 500 group showed a lower average age, though not a significant difference (62 years compared to 67 years). The lateral compartment of all knees in both groups were Ahlbach grade 0 or 1 group before operation or entry to the OA 500 register.
In the UKR group, four out of 42 knees showed progression of a single Ahlbach grade (9.5%). 2 revisions for arthritic progression were added to this group making a total of six out of 42 (14.3%). In the control group 12 of the 42 knees progressed by one or two Ahlbach grades and a further case underwent surgery making a total of 13 (31%). This difference was significant (p< 0.01).
Conclusion: Recent studies have shown that with a better understanding of design, improved selection of patients and better surgical technique, a UKR can have at least as good, if not better, results than a TKR at 5 year follow up, and has benefits of preservation of anatomy, earlier rehabilitation, preservation of bone stock and easier revision. Our radiological findings in this study will need to be correlated with further randomised prospective clinical studies, but suggest that progression of Osteoarthritis is reduced by UKR, and that this should be an additional stated benefit of this surgical technique.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Roger Smith. Correspondence should be addressed to him c/o British Orthopaedic Association, Royal College of Surgeons, 35-42 Lindoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PN.
