Abstract
This is a prospective study assessing the results of patients receiving large fragment allograft and a vascularised fibular graft following primary malignant tumour resections around the hip and the knee.
18 patients underwent tumor resection followed by reconstruction with large fragment allograft and vascularised fibular graft. Eight patients underwent resection arthrodesis of the hip, four underwent resection arthrodesis of the knee and six underwent intercalary resections. Following tumour resection with adequate margins, an appropriate sized allograft fragment was internally fixed with either a plate or an intramedullary nail. A vascularised fibular graft was used to span the gap between the remaining host bones. Osteosarcoma was the commonest diagnosis. The patients were clinically assessed by MSTS functional scoring system and radiologically assessed at regular intervals.
The mean age was 26 years (range12–70) and majority of the patients was men. 11 patients received preoperative chemotherapy. Mean follow-up was 85 months (range 8–153). Six patients have died of metastatic disease at a mean of 33 months. Complications included local recurrence in two, deep infection in one and stress fracture of the fibula in two cases. One patient with local recurrence and the other with deep infection underwent an amputation. Majority of the patients had good or excellent MSTS scores at final follow-up and 75% of the patients are engaged in physically active occupations. Graft hypertrophy was evident in majority of the patients.
Our experience clearly indicates that reconstruction with large fragment allograft and vascularised fibular graft is a useful limb salvage procedure with the fibula hypertrophying slowly with time. The eventual fracture of the allograft or failure of the allograft-plate composite is to be expected but is not deleterious due to the physiological response of the vascularised fibula to the weight bearing stresses over time. We feel that this biological solution is likely to demonstrate superior long-term results compared to a prosthetic reconstruction.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom.
