Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

OUTCOME OF THE TWO SURGEONS APPROACH FOR THORACIC OUTLET SYNDROME



Abstract

Many surgical approaches at decompression have been attempted for the thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS), but only the transaxillary and supraclavicular routes carry the best outcomes. More recently, a selective and tailored approach via the supraclavicular route has been favoured. We performed a retrospective review between 1978 and 1998, and report the outcome of the ‘’two surgeon approach’’ for TOS via the supraclavicular method.

An orthopaedic and vascular surgeon jointly conducted 30 operations for disabling symptoms relating to TOS in 27 patients (21F, 6M), mean age of 29 yrs (range 18–63 yrs), having performed the preoperative assessment in conjunction with a neurologist. In all cases, it was essential that patient selection for surgery was determined on clinical grounds rather than the presence of a cervical rib. Anterior scalenectomy was performed via the supraclavicular route except in one case where the infraclavicular route was utilised. Additional surgical procedures were carried out according to the underlying abnormalities, i.e. excision of cervical rib or band or medial scalenectomy. The first rib was always spared.

At mean follow-up of 37 mths (range 3-228 mths), 26/30 sides (87%) had excellent or good results. The results were fair or poor in three cases where scalenec-tomy alone was performed. There were no major complications and no patients required a re-operation. 24 patients (89%) returned to their previous lifestyle or occupation.

Our results suggest that, with a multidisciplinary assessment and two-surgeon team, good to excellent surgical outcomes can be achieved via the supraclavicular route without resection of the first rib. Instead of the current practise of routine transaxillary first rib resection, we recommend decompression via this approach with further procedures tailored to the abnormality identified.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom.