Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

AN AUDIT OF SKELETAL TUBERCULOSIS IN AN INNER LONDON HOSPITAL



Abstract

Skeletal tuberculosis is an indolent disease whose diagnosis is often delayed. Evidence of pulmonary tuberculosis is present in less than 50% of cases. We present our experience from a small inner city district hospital of the difficulties managing patients with skeletal tuberculosis.

During the period 1988 to 1998 a total of 38 patients with tuberculous osteomyelitis confirmed microbiologically by tissue culture or histologically on material gained at biopsy presented to our inner city hospital serving 250 000 patients.

Two groups of patients were identified in our series. There was an acute group that tended to affect the appendicular skeleton and who responded to local treatment plus chemotherapy with restoration of normal function. In contrast the second group, who were difficult to diagnose, had axial skeleton involvement, deteriorated before treatment and had a poor outcome despite treatment. Failure of admitting medical teams to examine the axial skeleton in their confused patients led to a delay in diagnosis of skeletal tuberculosis in this second group with profound consequences.

All health professionals will be encountering skeletal tuberculosis more frequently with the recent resurgence of pulmonary tuberculosis. They may have little experience with the management of this condition and may overlook the diagnosis with consequent catastrophic results. A high index of suspicion is required for prompt diagnosis with early referral to an orthopaedic surgeon improving outcome.

Survival in the wake of hindquarter amputation and oncological treatment is improving; the hindquarter amputee population is increasing. Some amputees function well others do not.

To assess quality of life and function of hindquarter amputees.

21 amputees (10 females and 11 males) consented to take part in the study. Ethics approval was sought. Assessment was performed using postal questionnaires; SF36 for quality of life; TESS (Toronto Extremity Salvage Score) for physical function and mobility; IEFF( International Index for Erectile Function) for male sexual function; a prosthetics questionnaire to assess prosthetic use.

Mean age of the group was 55 with the mean survival of 7 years post amputation.

Quality of life results were compared to normal subjects and patients for long tern illness. Amputees had a significant reduction in quality of life concerning physical function and pain. Social function, mental health and energy levels were equivalent to patients with long term illness.

The mean TESS result was 56.9 with females having a mean score of 61.7 and male of 48. 50% of the group considered themselves as severely to completely disabled; 50% considered themselves moderately disabled. Five were in full time employment.

Six males responded to the sexual function questionnaire. Impotence was universally experienced.

Only five amputees used their prosthesis regularly. All amputees have experienced and 20 continue to experience phantom pain.

This study illustrates that hindquarter amputees have poor physical function and a low quality of life. Phantom pain is universally experienced. Male amputees experience impotence. Addressing these areas would improve the life of current and future hindquarter amputees.

The abstracts were prepared by Mr Simon Donell. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Department of Orthopaedics, Norfolk & Norwich Hospital, Level 4, Centre Block, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, United Kingdom.