RADIAL FOREARM BUCKLE FRACTURES, AN AUDIT OF PATIENT AND PARENT SATISFACTION WITH TREATMENT IN AN ALDER HEY SPLINT INSTEAD OF PLASTER

Abstract

To assess patient/parent satisfaction with treatment of radial Forearm Buckle Fractures without the necessity of fracture clinic visits.

A+E staff were provided with definitions and suitable example X-Rays of radial forearm buckle fractures. The A+E staff were asked to mark the films with a green dot for Radiological review if the patient was included in the study, and these films were seen within 24 hours by a consultant radiologist.

Over a three month period all patients with radial forearm buckle fractures seen in A+E were treated with an Alder Hey splint rather than plaster, they were then given a fracture clinic appointment for three weeks later. At this visit the medical staff completed a proforma with the following information, appropriateness of the diagnosis, side, bone/cortex involved, degree of angulation as well as the mode of injury.

The patients and their parents were asked whether they were happy with the level of support that the splint gave and whether they would have been happy to remove the splint without visiting the fracture clinic.

72 (86.7%) had suffered low energy injuries, 5 (6%) high energy injuries, 5 (6%) did not attend their clinic appointment.

65 of 78 (83%) of parents and 65 of 72 (90%) of patients felt that the level of provided support was adequate (6 patients too young to answer)

58 of 78 (74%) of parents and 53 of 72 (74%) of patients would have been happy to make the decision to remove the splint themselves (6 patients too young to answer)

5 (6%) of the diagnoses were deemed to be inappropriate, of these 2 were picked up in radiology review and sent to clinic and 3 were soft tissue injuries.

We feel that the results show that the majority of patients with radial forearm buckle fractures (appropriate guidelines available to A+E staff) do not need to be seen in the fracture clinic, as long as their X-Rays are reviewed and any inappropriately diagnosed fractures sent to clinic. This has significant implications both for fracture clinic workload and also financially for hospitals.