Abstract
In shoulder arthroplasty the glenoid component remains a problem. Hemi-arthroplasty requires less theatre time and gives rise to fewer complications. The question is whether the results of hemi-arthroplasty are inferior to those of total shoulder arthroplasty.
We assessed 189 patients who since July 1994 had undergone hemi-arthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty, excluding patients who suffered fractures, malunion or nonunion. In 77 patients (41%) the glenoid was replaced. The mean age of patients was 62 years. All humeral and glenoid components were cemented. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included pain (visual analogue scale), muscle strength, range of motion, functional activities and Constant shoulder scores.
At this early stage, total shoulder arthroplasty appears to give slightly better functional results than hemi-arthroplasty. However, there were five (6.5%) complications associated with the glenoid components, including glenoid component fracture, loosening and migration. Hemi-arthroplasty eliminates concerns about glenoid wear and glenoid complications, and we believe total shoulder arthroplasty should be reserved for specific problems.
The abstracts were prepared by Professor M. B. E. Sweet. Correspondence should be addressed to him at The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193 South Africa
