Abstract
A patient’s response to knee assessment questionnaires is often subjective and linked to age and cultural expectations.
In New Zealand 150 people, split into three groups of ages 20 to 40 years, 40 to 60 years and over 60 years, were given three commonly used knee assessment questionnaires. All were examined objectively to determine that their knees were normal. Scores in these groups were compared to similar groups of Canadian subjects and the results analysed.
The results show significant differences in expectations between the age groups. Older people were reluctant to score maximum points for their normal knees. The Hospital for Special Surgery’s knee score gave the lowest results, followed by the Knee Society score. In the over-60-year group there was a significant difference between scores in New Zealand and Canada, with Canadians tending to score higher in all scores.
These findings have implications when it comes to comparing results of total knee arthroplasty in different countries and age groups. This study has been expanded to include other countries in an attempt to find a mathematical formula that will make future comparisons more relevant.
The abstracts were prepared by Professor M. B. E. Sweet. Correspondence should be addressed to him at The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University of Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193 South Africa
