Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF SELF-STABILISING FORCEPS USED FOR POSTERIOR FIXATION OF THE SPINE: EVALUATION OF BILATERAL FORCEPS



Abstract

Purpose: As proposed by Marnay, posterior fixation of the spine with self-stabilising forceps facilitates the operative procedure. These forceps enable lamolaminal, pediculolaminal, or pediculotransverse fixations. We developed a method for posterior fixation of the spine where a self-stabilising forceps links the lateral forceps hook to a medial hook allowing a bilateral hold on the segment for better fixation and correction. The aim of this work was to evaluate the contribution of the self-stabilising forceps compared with standard hooks during reduction movements.

Material and methods: Pull-out tests were conducted on five different holds using a supratransversal hook, a sublaminal hook, a pediculotransversal forceps, and a pediculolaminal forceps (Spine-Evolution), and a bipediculolaminal hook mounted on two vertebrae (Sofamor-Danek). The tests were performed on anatomic specimens. The test procedure was a reduction of a kyphosis of the upper part to the tested segment. Fourteen measurements were made for each implant.

Results: Pull-out force (N) was (mean, range): supratrans-versal hook (24, 8-40) < pediculotransvers forceps (154, 80-280) < supralaminal hook (360, 120–560) < pediculolam-inal forceps (491, 440–550) < bipediculolaminal forceps on two vertebrae (711, 400–800). The differences were significant.

Discussion: These results must be considered under the experimental conditions. Fixation with a supratransversal hook did not produce a reliable hold. The pediculotransversal forceps failed in one case due to fracture of a weak transversal mass. The supralaminal hook exhibited more consistent pull-out resistance. In most of the cases, pull-out occurred by fracture of the posterior arch. The bilateral self-stabilising forceps demonstrated the greatest pull-out resistance. During the five tests made with this forceps, the test was limited by the weakness of the osteosynthesis rods used so the maximal resistance to pull-out could not be measured (> 800 N).

Conclusion: The self-stabilising pediculolaminal forceps provides greater pull-out resistance than hooks alone. The self-stabilizing bipediculolaminal forceps allows a new surgical strategy for segmentary fixation with promising potential.

The abstracts were prepared by Pr. Jean-Pierre Courpied (General Secretary). Correspondence should be addressed to him at SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France