Abstract
Introduction: Limb reperfusion in patients following pneumatic tourniquet-controlled surgery is associated with nitric oxide (NO) generation. Meanwhile, NO mediates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-cytoprotection in myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. In addition, VEGF is contributory in attenuating skeletal muscle ischaemia-reperfusion injury (SMRI). Whether this effect of VEGF is NO-mediated in SMRI is unknown. We investigate whether systemic nitric oxide production in tourniquet-induced SMRI is dependent on VEGF release.
Methods: Anaesthetised male C57BL/6 mice were randomised (n=10 per group) into two groups: time controls (no tourniquet) and test animals with bilateral hindlimb tourniquets (SMRI; 2 hours of ischaemia, 2 hours of reperfusion). Blood samples were collected in test animals prior to ischaemia and after 2 hours of reperfusion. In controls, blood samples were collected at the same corresponding time points. Serum VEGF, nitric oxide metabolites (nitrite and nitrate) and the proinflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis fractor (TNF)-α (an indicator of systemic inflammation) were determined. At the end of reperfusion, the lungs and muscle (right gastrocnemius) were harvested and tissue injury determined by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, a marker of neutrophil infiltration. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and statistical comparison was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with significance attributed to P,0.05.
Results: In comparison to control animals, both the muscle (4.9±0.3 versus 4±0.03 units/g of wet tissue; P=0.02) and lung (16.7±1.9 versus 10.4±0.5; P=0.005) MPO activity at the end of reperfusion was significantly greater in test animals.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that SMRI results in local and systemic proinflammatory responses. In contrast to myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury, nitric oxide production in tourniquet-induced SMRI is VEGF-independent. Alternative mechanisms for nitric oxide production in tourniquet-controlled limb surgery requires further evaluation.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Ray Moran. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Irish Orthopaedic Association, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin