Abstract
Six pairs of human cadaver femora were divided equally into two groups one of which received a non-cemented reference implant and the other a very short non-dependent experimental implant. Thirteen strain-gauge rosettes were attached to the external surface of each specimen and, during application of combined axial and torsional loads to the femoral head, the strains in both groups were measured.
After the insertion of a non-cemented femoral component, the normal pattern of a progressive proximal-to-distal increase in strains was similar to that in the intact femur and the strain was maximum near the tip of the prosthesis. On the medial and lateral aspects of the proximal femur, the strains were greatly reduced after implantation of both types of implant. The pattern and magnitude of the strains, however, were closer to those in the intact femur after insertion of the experimental stem than in the reference stem. On the anterior and posterior aspects of the femur, implantation of both types of stem led to increased principal strains E1, E2 and E3. This was most pronounced for the experimental stem.
Our findings suggest that the experimental stem, which has a more anatomical proximal fit without having a distal stem and cortex contact, can provide immediate postoperative stability. Pure proximal loading by the experimental stem in the metaphysis, reduction of excessive bending stiffness of the stem by tapering and the absence of contact between the stem and the distal cortex may reduce stress shielding, bone resorption and thigh pain.
