Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Cemented versus uncemented femoral components in the ring hip prosthesis



Download PDF

Abstract

A prospective, randomised and independently assessed trial of the Ring UPM total hip replacement showed that the quality of the early result was better if the femoral prosthesis was cemented than if it was not. More patients with cemented prostheses were painfree at four months (58% cemented:42% uncemented) and at one year (63% cemented:50% uncemented), but at two years pain relief was equal in both groups. At two years significantly more patients with cemented prostheses could walk without support (96% cemented:62% uncemented, p = 0.01 to 0.05). There is a need for more similar trials to compare the results of contemporary designs of cemented and uncemented total hip prostheses.

For access options please click here