Abstract
The hypothesis provides a theoretical justification for, and re-emphasises the practical importance of, close reduction and strict immobilisation in the treatment of fractures of the neck of the femur. It does not support the view that failure of union is caused by vascular damage at the time of the original injury. Unexpected failure of union after nailing is more likely caused by unrecognised imperfection of reduction and the acknowledged deficiencies of internal fixation.
Attempts to improve results by passing the sartorius muscle around the fracture (Adams 1956), or by attaching muscle or joint capsule to the proximal fragment, have failed, because such soft tissues are swept off by the acetabular rim when the hip is flexed or medially rotated.
Further work is required, both on the more detailed biochemistry of haemarthroses and on the practical and wider implications of the hypothesis.
